Roundtable markCrucible
Contact Us
Premium Boardroom Simulation

Your AI Braintrust. Forge a defensible brief in under an hour

Subject your question to the heat of twelve expert Agents across three stages Thesis · Antithesis · Synthesis. Watch them burn away the noise to extract an executive-grade brief with citations, dissent, and immediate next actions.

Enter the Crucible
Capability01

Deep-Reasoning Engines

Powered by leading LLMs selected for high-pressure logic, coherence, and cross-domain synthesis.

Curation02

Precision-Tuned Agents

Curated experts arrive with distinct mental models and competing strategic directives

Governance03

Defensible Audit Trails

Every conclusion ships with claim, logs, and convergence for total accountability.

Network04

Crucible Marketplace

Import specialized, battle-tested Agents from the community marketplace.

Run by experts
“Crucible gets us from open question to a defensible executive brief in a single evening board sprint.”
Elena ParkManaging Partner · Meridian Ventures
“We rely on Knights to surface blind spots before we greenlight eight-figure deployments.”
Marcus HaleCOO · Nautilus Operations
“The audit-ready artifacts let our governance committee trace every recommendation back to cited evidence.”
Priya NandakumarChief of Staff · Horizon Capital
“Running a Crucible feels like having a dozen trusted experts in the room, but without the scheduling circus.”
Max KuanFounder · Roundtable Labs

Beta teams across venture, operations, and compliance rely on Crucible for board-grade decisions.

Why Multi-Agent Debate Works

Multi-agent debate outperforms single chat

Argue · Critique · Converge

Multiple agents propose answers, cross-examine one another, and then a selector aggregates the strongest chain. Across tasks, this consistently beats a single model's one-shot reply, using the same base model.

  • Arithmetic accuracy rose from ~67% to ~82% when using multi-agent debate vs. single model output (same base LM).
  • Grade-school math improved from ~77% to ~85% under debate protocols.
  • Reduces invalid steps and improves factual consistency compared to single-pass or simple self-reflection.
References
Orchestrated Structure

The Adversarial Synthesis Protocol

We don't accept the first answer an AI gives. Instead, we force multiple Agents to debate your question. This stress-test burns away errors and "hallucinations," finding the flaws that a standard chat window misses.

Frame the brief
1

Question & Setup

Define the Challenge Describe your situation and your goals. The system automatically recruits a team of up to 12 AI Agents tailored to your specific problem, ensuring you have the right experts to argue every side.

Gather evidence
2

Research

Before the debate begins, every Agent investigates the topic separately. They gather real-time evidence and cite their sources. This ensures that when the argument starts, it is based on verified data, not just opinion.

State positions
3

Opening Positions

Each Agent presents their case based on the evidence they found. We map out their specific claims, ensuring clear battle lines are drawn before the cross-examination begins.

Structured debate
4

Debate Rounds

Just like a courtroom, the Agents challenge each others evidence. They spot contradictions, rebut attacks, and refine their points. It is a disciplined process designed to filter out weak ideas and keep the focus on the truth.

Synthesize consensus
5

Red Team & Convergence

We look for the holes in the argument one last time. Then, we bring the different viewpoints together into a clear summary, noting where the Agents agree and rating the certainty of the final decision.

Board-ready output
6

Defensible Brief

You receive a polished, board-ready document that withstands scrutiny. It includes the final strategy, full citations, risk assessments, and a record of where the Agents disagreed. It is built to be audited, trusted, and acted upon immediately.

Use Cases

See the Crucible in Action Examine the Output

Browse real executive briefs generated by the system to see the depth of research, the rigor of the debate, and the clarity of the final decision.

For Product Managers, Founders & Startup Builders

Product Strategy & Go-to-Market

A SaaS team is debating whether to launch a new feature called 'Adaptive Billing.' They need fast, multi-angle reasoning across product, engineering, marketing, finance, and legal to decide if it is worth building and how to validate it before launch.

  • Simulate an AI executive board to stress-test your roadmap.
  • Expose technical, market, and compliance blind spots early.
  • Produce a one-page go/no-go Decision Brief and rollout plan.

For GTM Leaders, Sales Managers & Chiefs of Staff

Enterprise Deal Strategy

A B2B sales team is pursuing ACME Corp. They have an RFP, a known competitor, and limited internal coordination. They need a unified win plan covering stakeholder mapping, ROI story, objection handling, and negotiation levers.

  • Convene an AI deal-desk braintrust spanning sales, legal, and finance.
  • Generate stakeholder maps, ROI narratives, and proof-of-value plans.
  • Deliver a concise Close Plan with next actions and decision owners.
Premium Reasoning Stack

The Best of All Worlds

No single AI is perfect at everything. Some are creative visionaries; others are strict logicians or fact-checkers. We combine them into a single team so they cover each other's blind spots. The creative Agents generate ideas, while the logical Agents check the math giving you a complete, balanced result.

ModelProviderWhy we chose it
GPT-5.1OpenAIOur go-to model for complex problem-solving across math, coding, and analysis. It's reliable, follows instructions precisely, and can handle both text and visual information.
Claude Sonnet 4.5AnthropicExcels at complex instructions or working through multi-step tasks. Can process extremely long documents and maintain context throughout extended conversations.
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeekA sharp, analytical mind that is particularly strong at mathematics, logic, and code review. Brings a different perspective in finding mistakes that others may miss.
Gemini 2.5GoogleCan process huge volumes of information at once-think of whole research dossiers, reports, and documents. Great at synthesizing complex information from multiple sources.
Grok 4xAIBrings a fresh, contrarian perspective to challenge assumptions. Strong at problem reasoning and providing structured, reliable outputs.

Disclaimer: The explanations above reflect our internal evaluations and opinions, provided for informational purposes only. They do not represent endorsements or official performance claims from the model providers.

Learn more ->

Ready to Get Started?

Pay per session. No subscriptions. No credit pack. Controllable Costs

Why hire a consultant when you can Forge a brief instantly? Each session acts as a "workshop in a box" automating the team assembly, the debate, and the final report. You get the full defensible strategy without the monthly retainer.

Enter the CrucibleCommunity Edition
FAQs

Common Questions

Here are the questions we hear most from teams evaluating Crucible for critical reasoning workflows. Reach out if you need a deeper dive.

Crucible forces Agents to challenge each other's claims, burn away errors, and converge on defensible conclusions. You receive a brief with full citations, areas of dissent, and confidence scores. Every brief is built for scrutiny we still recommend a human strategist reviews before execution.
Yes. You deploy the number of Agents you need and select the intelligence tier for each seat. The pricing calculator on our pricing page shows the total cost before you start. Enterprise workspaces can set per-session caps or require approvals.
Session events and debate content are stored securely to enable history and analysis. You configure retention periods in settings, and the system automatically purges data according to your preferences. You can delete individual sessions or your entire account at any time. See our privacy policy for details.
Crucible orchestrates premium intelligence from OpenAI (o3), Anthropic (Claude Sonnet 4.5), DeepSeek (R1), Google (Gemini 2.5), MiniMax (M1), and xAI (Grok 4). Assign models per Agent or let the system auto-seat the optimal mix for your challenge.
Sessions typically complete within 45 to 60 minutes, including convergence. Each simulation can host up to twelve Agents, and you can run multiple sessions in parallel.